Once again, this is a metaphor for copyrights & restrictive licenses – especially “reserving” “rights” even though you “won’t enforce them.” For Terry Hancock, who hopefully will explain more in the comments.
TriggerOnce again, this is a metaphor for copyrights & restrictive licenses – especially “reserving” “rights” even though you “won’t enforce them.” For Terry Hancock, who hopefully will explain more in the comments. 5 comments to TriggerLeave a Reply |
||
♡ 2024 Mimi and Eunice. Copying is an act of love. Please copy and share. Powered by WordPress & Atahualpa |
It strikes me as a comment on fair use. It’s such a vague notion that we just have to trust the copyright holders won’t abuse it out of existence. Which, of course, they’ve been doing.
I see this as a metaphor for all types of power that one person can hold over another.
Well, Todd – if you have money-power, the only way to use this power is to divest yourself of it to another person – which at least in the short run ultimately results in your having a little bit less money-power, so that’s fundamentally different.
[…] Trigger « Mimi and Eunice My Other Things. Mimi & Eunice's Facebook Page Because Facebook refuses to make thumbnails of linked horizontal images, I upload each one manually here. It's the only way to share Mimi &am… […]
I wonder what fraction of male US citizens, born in 1960 and after, trust “our” government enough to sign up for the military slavery that will never happen, in order to scare Brezhnev out of Afghanistan.